This post is also available in:
English 
Português (Portuguese (Brazil)) 
Русский (Russian)
Short answer
Medical charity Médecins Sans Frontières, also known as Doctors Without Borders, announced in February 2026 that it would not provide the staff lists requested by Israel as a condition for maintaining access to Gaza and the West Bank, and Israel suspended its operating license along with those of other organizations that declined to comply with the required security and transparency standards.
Staff transparency is a standard security measure in active combat zones, and in Gaza this concern is concrete rather than theoretical, as there is documented evidence over many years, including since October 2023, that individuals operating under humanitarian or medical cover have been linked to Hamas, including evidence that officials associated with Doctors Without Borders in Gaza were simultaneously members of Palestinian terrorist organizations.
Under international humanitarian law, a state may impose reasonable security conditions on organizations operating in a war zone, and Israel argues that it has a duty to protect its population consistent with the principle of the Responsibility to Protect (R2P).
The organizations whose licenses were suspended account for less than 1% of total aid activity in Gaza. Humanitarian assistance continues through more than 20 organizations that met the requirements and were permitted to keep operating.
Long answer
Staff transparency is a basic security safeguard and a standard measure in any active combat zone. This requirement applies to all NGOs operating in sensitive areas, and Médecins Sans Frontières, also known as Doctors Without Borders, is not being singled out. In February 2026, the organization refused to provide the staff lists requested by Israel as a condition for maintaining access to Gaza and the West Bank.
Under international humanitarian law, Israel may impose reasonable security requirements on organizations operating in a war zone. A state has both the right and the obligation to protect its population, consistent with the principle of the Responsibility to Protect, and is not required to grant unrestricted access without oversight. Israel has stated clearly that humanitarian assistance is welcome, but the exploitation of humanitarian frameworks for terrorist activity is not.
This is not a theoretical concern. Humanitarian frameworks in Gaza have been repeatedly exploited for terror purposes, and there is documented evidence, including cases in which officials associated with Doctors Without Borders in Gaza were simultaneously members of Palestinian terrorist organizations. Israel has recorded instances of weapons stored in medical facilities, ambulances used to transport militants, NGO employees identified as members or collaborators of terrorist groups, and aid workers providing logistical or intelligence support under humanitarian cover. Without verified staff lists, such risks cannot be properly identified or prevented, leaving Israel no choice but to suspend the licenses of organizations that refused to meet required security and transparency standards.
Israel continues to allow large scale humanitarian aid, medical supplies, and international organizations to operate provided basic security requirements are met. COGAT, the Israeli defense body responsible for coordinating aid to Gaza, has stated that the organizations whose licenses were suspended account for less than 1% of the total aid entering the Gaza Strip, and that assistance continues through more than 20 organizations that complied with the requirements and were permitted to keep operating.
