This post is also available in:
English
Short answer
The February–March 2026 war between Israel and Iran is a joint allied war and a legitimate act of self-defense and collective defense under Article 51 of the UN Charter. Article 51 affirms that states have the right to defend themselves when attacked and that allies may assist in that defense.
For years Iran has waged indirect war through proxies such as Hezbollah, Hamas, and Palestinian Islamic Jihad, which have fired rockets, missiles, and drones at Israeli civilians while being armed, funded, and directed by Tehran. Iran has also repeatedly targeted U.S. forces and interests through proxy militias in Iraq and Syria, attacks on shipping, and support for groups that strike American personnel and bases. Iranian leaders have openly called for Israel’s destruction while building the largest proxy network in the region to wage war without direct accountability. International law does not require states to wait for a catastrophic attack before acting against a clear and ongoing threat.
Long answer
Under Article 51 of the UN Charter, every state has the inherent right to self-defense after an armed attack. For years Israel has faced sustained attacks from Iranian-backed groups including Hezbollah, Hamas, and Palestinian Islamic Jihad, which fire rockets, drones, and missiles at Israeli civilians. These groups form the backbone of Iran’s “Ring of Fire” strategy, a doctrine developed by the Iranian regime to surround Israel with heavily armed proxy forces in Lebanon, Gaza, Syria, Iraq, and Yemen capable of launching coordinated attacks on multiple fronts. These organizations are not independent actors. They are armed, trained, and funded by Iran as part of Tehran’s regional proxy network designed to pressure and ultimately destroy Israel.
Iran’s role became undeniable after the October 7, 2023 Hamas attack on Israel, in which about 1,200 people were murdered and more than 250 taken hostage. Hamas leaders and Iranian officials have openly acknowledged years of Iranian funding, weapons transfers, and military training that helped build Hamas’s capabilities. Iranian support included financing, rocket technology, drone development, and training through the IRGC Quds Force.
Iran has also repeatedly attacked U.S. forces and interests through proxy militias in Iraq and Syria, supported Houthi attacks on international shipping in the Red Sea, and backed groups responsible for attacks on American personnel and bases. These actions constitute a pattern of ongoing hostilities directed at both Israel and the United States.
Article 51 also recognizes collective self-defense, meaning allies can assist a state under attack. If Israel requests help, the United States can legally participate in military action against the source of those attacks.
International law also recognizes the principle of state survival. Iranian leaders have repeatedly called for the destruction of Israel while building the military capabilities and proxy network intended to achieve that goal. No government is required to wait for a catastrophic attack before acting.
Legal precedent such as the Caroline doctrine recognizes pre-emptive self-defense when a threat is immediate and overwhelming. Combined with Iran’s proxy warfare, direct attacks on U.S. forces, and its nuclear ambitions, the threat environment meets that threshold.
For these reasons, the February–March 2026 war between Israel and Iran, conducted as a joint allied operation, can be understood as an act of self-defense, collective defense, and prevention of a major regional attack.
