This post is also available in:
English
Short answer
“Israel is starving Gaza,” they said, while nearly 950 aid trucks had entered Gaza through Israel, fully cleared and ready for distribution. The real choke point? The UN had shut down 400+ aid sites, left trucks sitting idle, and left hundreds of pallets of aid inside Gaza at the Kerem Shalom Crossing, waiting for the UN to deliver them.
Israel and the U.S.-run Gaza Humanitarian Foundation delivered aid directly to Palestinian civilians. But the UN? It was too busy protecting its brand, cooperating with Hamas, and shutting down distribution points — leaving food to rot. Apparently, giving food directly to starving civilians without Hamas taking a cut and without a UN logo was somehow worse than letting them starve.
Israel was expected to feed its enemy — and still got accused of starving them. You couldn’t have it both ways. Pick one!
Long answer
“Israel is starving Gaza!”
Right. That was why nearly 950 fully loaded aid trucks were already inside Gaza, cleared, packed, and ready to feed people — yet sitting idle. The crossings were open. The real problem started after the aid got in.But of course, they didn’t blame the UN, which had shut down over 400 distribution points, closed kitchens, parked its trucks, and left drivers on strike, while hundreds of pallets of aid were sitting inside Gaza at the Kerem Shalom Crossing. They didn’t question the fact that aid convoys were routinely looted. No — this had to be Israel’s fault, obviously.
Instead of admitting their entire aid system was falling apart, the UN ran a PR campaign straight out of Hamas’s playbook. While aid piled up unused inside Gaza, UN officials kept chanting the same headline: “Israel is starving Gaza.” And just like that, Hamas got its favorite propaganda — gift-wrapped with a UN logo.
Meanwhile, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) — backed by Israel and the U.S. — was doing the unthinkable: delivering aid directly to Palestinians without Hamas profiting from it. Their latest “crime”? Offering to work with the UN to fix the chaos.
The GHF’s chairman, Rev. Johnnie Moore, had even offered security and logistics support — because clearly, someone had to.
The UN’s response? A polite mumble about being “open to cooperation”… but only if all the proper humanitarian buzzwords were met. Translation? They might have considered it, but only if GHF stopped making them look bad by actually helping people.Delivering aid directly to Palestinians — without the UN’s stamp or Hamas’s cut — was apparently a bigger scandal than starvation itself. Perfect if the goal was to win Hamas’s PR war.
