This post is also available in:
English
Short answer
Israel will not free Marwan Barghouti, and it’s not hard to understand why. Barghouti is a convicted terrorist serving five life sentences plus 40 additional years for directing a series of deadly attacks on buses, restaurants, and civilians during the Second Intifada, with extensive evidence linking him to multiple murders. His imprisonment is based on proven involvement in orchestrated violence, not political disagreement.
Yet he is now being marketed as “the Palestinian Mandela,” as if a slogan and a lobbying campaign funded by foreign political groups could erase a record of terrorism. The comparison is absurd: Nelson Mandela rejected attacks on civilians and sought coexistence, while Barghouti repeatedly endorsed armed violence as the only legitimate strategy against Israel. Nothing he has said in prison indicates he has renounced that position or abandoned support for terrorism.
This is precisely why Israel refuses to release him, because no responsible state frees a convicted mass murderer who still endorses violence simply to satisfy foreign pressure or propaganda.
Long answer
Do not be fooled by the well-funded campaign claiming “Barghouti is the Palestinian Mandela.” The comparison is a farce. Nelson Mandela was a political prisoner who, even as leader of an armed resistance, publicly rejected targeting civilians and insisted on avoiding loss of life. Barghouti, by contrast, is a convicted murderer by every international legal standard, serving five life sentences plus 40 years for his direct role in multiple murders and attempted murders during the Second Intifada. He was found guilty of orchestrating, directing, and financing deadly terrorist attacks on buses, restaurants, and public spaces. His imprisonment is grounded in overwhelming evidence of violence, not politics. And nothing he has said in prison suggests he has abandoned this worldview.
So why the aggressive effort to rebrand a militant convicted of civilian murders as a political hero? Because it serves narrow Palestinian power struggles and the interests of Hamas. Barghouti’s long imprisonment has elevated him into a symbolic figure within Fatah, and many view him as a potential successor to Mahmoud Abbas who could unify a fractured movement. Hamas wants him freed because it knows Fatah is weak and divided, and because Barghouti’s popularity could destabilize the Palestinian Authority, especially given that Abbas opposes him and has already selected his preferred successor. Hamas also wants to present his release as a “national achievement” of the war it started and because Barghouti’s long-standing support for armed struggle aligns more closely with Hamas’s own ideology. Some in the West even imagine that a “strong leader” like Barghouti could help stabilize Gaza or revive diplomacy. But this fantasy has no basis in reality. Barghouti has no control over Hamas or Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and he cannot impose PA authority on Gaza even if he wished to. His symbolic status inside Fatah does not give him the power to make or enforce the difficult decisions any genuine peace agreement would require.
Marwan Barghouti is not Mandela, and releasing him would not bring peace. It would betray the victims of the attacks he helped organize and send a message that mass terrorism can be rewarded with political power, pushing Israelis and Palestinians further from any workable future. This is why Israel will not release him, because no nation committed to protecting its citizens sets free an unrepentant architect of terror simply to satisfy political narratives or delusional wishful thinking.
