This post is also available in:
English
Short answer
Candace Owens is a U.S. far-right influencer who built a brand on calling herself a “truth-teller” while recycling classic antisemitic tropes dressed up as internet contrarianism: blood-libel rhetoric, conspiracies about Jews running the media, and the usual “they control everything” nonsense. Then October 7 happened. While most of the world recoiled at Hamas’s cruelty and mass murder, Owens rushed to accuse Israel of “collective punishment,” ignored every documented Hamas atrocity, and began sharing any clip that fit her narrative — because why check facts when conspiracy vibes get more engagement?
In the age of algorithms, lies outrun rockets, and Owens turned that into a business model, becoming a reliable propaganda amplifier for Hamas and an even more lucrative one for herself. Win-win, just not for anyone with a working frontal lobe.
Long answer
Candace Owens was literally crowned “Antisemite of the Year.” Her record is a toxic cocktail of antisemitism, including medieval blood-libel mythology, including claims that Jews drink Christian blood, to conspiracies that Jews are pedophiles who run the media and are “taking over America,” all wrapped in modern anti-Israel hysteria. These are positions so grotesque and irrational that no informed person with a functional brain could take them seriously.
Candace Owens didn’t suddenly “become” antisemitic. Her embrace of far-right antisemitic rhetoric had been growing for years, slowly developing into a coherent toxic worldview. Her slide turned into freefall after October 7, 2023. When Hamas massacred more than 1,200 Israelis — raping, torturing, kidnapping children, and burning families alive — Owens responded by accusing Israel of “collective punishment” and insisting Western media was hiding nonexistent “Israeli crimes.”
Since then, she has acted as an unrestrained, unapologetic antisemite, willfully blind to documented reality. She circulates unverified clips and partisan talking points as “evidence,” while ignoring Hamas’s execution of civilians, its tunnel networks under hospitals and schools, its systematic theft of aid, and its use of children as shields. She dismisses Israel’s evacuation warnings, humanitarian corridors, and unprecedented coordination with aid groups. Her entire output is built around finding new ways to demonize Israel.
What makes this dangerous is her reach. Owens has millions of followers who view her as an authority in a landscape they believe is full of “fake news.” For many, she is their only exposure to the conflict.
Israel has faced far worse enemies than online influencers. But in the algorithm era, lies can outrun rockets — especially inside far-right and far-left echo chambers. Owens figured that out and monetized it, turning herself into a megaphone for Hamas propaganda and a virulent source of disinformation. It’s a win-win for her and for Hamas, and a loss for anyone who cares about truth, reality, or basic sanity.
