This post is also available in:
English
Русский (Russian)
Short answer
Academic titles don’t guarantee truth — plenty of professors and scholars have spread blatant falsehoods about Israel, with zero evidence. This isn’t “critical scholarship,” it’s antisemitism in disguise. When bias replaces facts, credentials become a shield for propaganda.
Question the argument — not just the degree. And yes, there are countless documented cases of academics — twisting history, inflating death tolls, and denying the Jews’ connection to their homeland.
Long answer
Being an academic doesn’t automatically make someone honest or objective… especially when it comes to Israel. Some of the most outrageous falsehoods have come from people with prestigious titles and university affiliations. Professors and scholars have repeatedly used their platforms not to enlighten, but to mislead, often pushing narratives that are factually baseless and ideologically driven.
Columbia University’s Joseph Massad, for example, has compared Zionism to Nazism and falsely accused Israel of genocide — claims that ignore both history and international law.
Judith Butler, a well-known academic, once described Hamas and Hezbollah as part of the global progressive left, conveniently ignoring the fact that both are internationally recognized terrorist organizations with openly genocidal goals.
And Ilan Pappé, a favorite among anti-Israel activists, openly admitted his agenda matters more than facts: “We do use facts… but we interpret them in a way that serves our cause.” Academic status is no guarantee of truth — especially when ideology trumps evidence.These aren’t isolated cases. Across Western universities, students are fed lectures and literature that deny the Jewish people’s historical ties to the land of Israel, portray Hamas as a legitimate liberation movement, or repeat casualty numbers and “war crime” claims straight from Hamas-controlled sources — with no verification and no scrutiny.
This isn’t just misinformation; it’s a product of a broken academic culture, where antisemitism/anti-Israelism is repackaged as critical theory and rewarded as post-colonial critique. The danger lies in how propaganda hides behind academic credentials.
When facts are replaced with bias, a PhD becomes a shield for dishonesty — not insight. And when universities look the other way, they legitimize disinformation that fuels hate. There are now plenty of public examples showing how distorted, anti-Israel narratives are passed off as scholarship.
This isn’t fringe — it’s mainstream.
That’s why arguments must be judged by evidence and logic, not by the title of the person delivering them.