This post is also available in:
English
Short answer
Both ancient & modern history shows us that big population shifts often follow wars and conflicts; it is just a part of life and is the telltale sign of one side winning a war and the other losing it. As a matter of fact, mass migrations happened in multitudes post-World War II.
U.S. President Donald Trump understands this phenomenon and used it as a basis for his Gaza plan. How he came to this is actually quite simple. On Oct 7th, 2023, Hamas declared war on Israel, following many years of violence and a multitude of attacks on Israel in the form of suicide bus bombings, rocket launches, knife attacks, and the kidnapping of Israeli civilians.Since the Israeli state has vowed to win over Hamas once and for all, the outcome is certain to be dire for civilians in the Gaza Strip, unless Hamas surrenders. And even before the current crisis, a third of the Gazans were itching to leave (but could not). And that number’s probably shot up now, following the war.
What Trump wants to do is help Gazans who want to leave the war zone voluntarily, by helping them get a fresh start in neighboring countries. This move would be coordinated by the U.S. and the absorbing countries.Based on Trump’s own claims, this relocation plan is not just about moving people around—it’s about breaking the endless cycle of violence that’s been plaguing the Middle East for decades since Hamas’ inception.
In addition, the Gaza plan aims at creating numerous jobs and economic opportunities for the entire region, through comprehensive redevelopment at a lower cost.This move could actually transform Gaza, for the first time ever, into a livable, desirable, glittering Mediterranean “Riviera.” Trump’s estimated budget of $30–40 billion is significantly more cost-effective compared to the $98–127 billion projected for rebuilding Gaza with its current population.
As of 2025, Gaza has always been synonymous with terrorist organizations (PFLP, Hamas & Islamic Jihad) & poor economic conditions for its inhabitants—so instead of doing the “same old, same old,” perhaps it’s time to think outside the box?
Long answer
Did you know that Gaza was once a jewel of the Mediterranean? The word “Gaza” means treasure house in medieval Arabic. Trump’s plan envisions precisely this: turning Gaza into a thriving “Riviera of the Middle East.” People call Trump crazy and say the plan is a fantasy, but in fact, there is a very robust logic behind it.
From a historical perspective, the movement of populations is a usual occurrence following wars. By the end of World War II, approximately 11 million people were displaced in Europe alone. In the three years following the 1948 war, about 700,000 Jews immigrated to Israel, many of whom were displaced from Arab and Muslim lands due to hostility and systematic expulsions.
More recent examples include the Myanmar Crisis of 2021, where around 280,000 displacements occurred during military crackdowns and armed resistance, and the Sudan Conflict in 2023, which displaced approximately 6 million people. This is just how things happen in real life, and the Gaza war is no different.
The plan Trump proposes includes several potential benefits for unbiased consideration.
First, it should be noted that when the Palestinians say that their land “is not for sale,” it means they intend to continue the increase of so-called “refugees” who live on this land without any chance for a future. This forced breeding strategy is born out of a violent mentality and generates more deaths than any defensive move Israel has ever made.
By breaking the cycle of violence, the plan seeks to offer a new approach to a long-standing issue that none of the previous and traditional ideas (i.e., the two-state solution) have been able to solve.
Not only would this plan offer the only viable alternative for creating long-term stability in the Middle East, but it would also ensure that events such as the October 7th massacre never happens again.
Second, if executed, the plan would create numerous jobs and economic opportunities for the entire region through comprehensive redevelopment at a lower cost. The estimated budget of $30–40 billion is significantly more cost-effective compared to the $98–127 billion projected for rebuilding Gaza with its current population.
A reconstructed Gaza would provide improved living conditions, economic opportunities, and a chance for a better future for those who reside in it.
Lastly, temporarily relocating Gaza’s 2.3 million Palestinian residents to neighboring countries, primarily Egypt and Jordan, during reconstruction would undeniably offer them immediate and improved living conditions. The proposal includes a $25,000 grant per Gazan family for relocation, potentially opening up new opportunities for those who choose to resettle.
Do Gazans want to relocate? A credible poll conducted one month before the October 7th attack, by Khalil Shikaki’s Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research, indicated that about one-third of Gazans wanted to emigrate at that time. This number may have increased due to the ongoing war.
Unlike most conflicts, Trump’s plan provides a structured option for displaced Gazans who choose to freely relocate.
So, bottom line, whom does this plan not serve? It does not serve those who seek to perpetuate the vicious cycle that has kept the region in a state of turmoil—namely Iran, Qatar, and the Palestinian leadership who attack Israel and contest its right to exist.
As you can see, the logic behind Trump’s plan is quite simple, follows previous historical migration patterns, and does not aim to harm the Palestinian population at all. To the contrary, it seeks to revitalize Gaza and bring peace and prosperity to the region.
